IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v56y2025i3p261-288.html

Examining the Relationship Between Mental Workload, Learning Outcomes and Acceptance in a Process-Improvement Simulation Game

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Szedlak
  • Bert Leyendecker

Abstract

This study explores the impact of process optimizations in business simulation games on learning outcomes, mental workload, and the acceptance of process improvements. A business simulation game was executed in two rounds: an initial baseline round and a subsequent round featuring process optimizations. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and NASA TLX were employed to measure performance and perceived mental workload, respectively. Results indicate that process optimizations led to improvements in performance metrics such as lead-time and throughput, and mental workload significantly influenced both short-term learning outcomes and the readiness to implement process optimizations. The study emphasizes the importance of considering mental workload in the design of simulation games to enhance learning outcomes and practical application of improvements. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of more effective business simulation games in vocational education.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Szedlak & Bert Leyendecker, 2025. "Examining the Relationship Between Mental Workload, Learning Outcomes and Acceptance in a Process-Improvement Simulation Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 56(3), pages 261-288, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:56:y:2025:i:3:p:261-288
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781241313202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781241313202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781241313202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    2. Jayshree Suresh, 2019. "Board Room Simulation Game Helps Strategic Management Course," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 8(3), pages 232-240, December.
    3. Franck Taillandier & Carole Adam, 2018. "Games Ready to Use: A Serious Game for Teaching Natural Risk Management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(4), pages 441-470, August.
    4. Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara & Enric Serradell-López, 2018. "Student interactions in online discussion forums: their perception on learning with business simulation games," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 419-429, April.
    5. Anastasia Dimitriadou & Naza Djafarova & Ozgur Turetken & Margaret Verkuyl & Alexander Ferworn, 2021. "Challenges in Serious Game Design and Development: Educators’ Experiences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(2), pages 132-152, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theresa Tribaldos & Flurina Schneider, 2021. "Enabling Players to Develop Theories of Change for Sustainable Development: A Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(5), pages 664-678, October.
    2. Nina V. Nygren & Ville Kankainen & Lucas Brunet, 2022. "Offsetting Game—Framing Environmental Issues in the Design of a Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(6), pages 615-644, December.
    3. Franck Taillandier & Annabelle Moatty & Pénélope Brueder & Corinne Curt & Pascal Di Maiolo & Bruno Beullac & Alexandra Schleyer-Lindenmann, 2025. "Sim-MANA: A Learning Game to Promote Integrated Flood Risk Management Using Nature-based Solutions," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 56(6), pages 576-609, December.
    4. Shuangyi Zhang & ·Surnggahb Jahng & Junghyen Kim, 2025. "Interactivity, entertainment, and the new authenticity: Key factors influencing user participation in digital rural script games," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    5. Tibor Kiss & Roland Schmuck, 2021. "A Longitudinal Study of the Skills and Attitudes Conveyed by Two Business Simulation Games in Pécs, Hungary," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 435-464, August.
    6. Timothy C. Clapper, 2018. "Serious Games Are Not All Serious," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(4), pages 375-377, August.
    7. Christian Neuwirth, 2020. "EQUILIBRIUM game: a virtual field trip through a complex system," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 223-238, April.
    8. Sara Rye & Emel Aktas, 2022. "Serious Games as a Validation Tool for PREDIS: A Decision Support System for Disaster Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-37, December.
    9. Wijitbusaba Marome & Boonanan Natakun & Diane Archer, 2021. "Examining the Use of Serious Games for Enhancing Community Resilience to Climate Risks in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:56:y:2025:i:3:p:261-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.