IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v54y2023i3p375-394.html

Players Perception of the Chemistry in the Video Game No Man’s Sky

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Santos
  • Nelson Zagalo
  • Carla Morais

Abstract

Background No Man’s Sky (NMS) is a sci-fi videogame about survival and exploration where players fly spaceships, search for elements, and use them to build, trade, and survive. Despite evolving around scientific concepts, NMS isn’t a serious game, and not all the scientific content in the game is presented with evidence. Theory and Method Looking at the interceptions between videogames and science, and moving to how science communication, both in theory and practice, can be explored within the videogame’s paradigm, a survey was developed to better understand how NMS players perceive the scientific content in the game. Aims Are players aware of the scientific content and how it is presented in NMS? Can they decipher it, question it and understand it under real-world rules? With the data collected from 124 respondents from 23 countries, we aim to better understand how an entertainment videogame can potentially help scientists, educators, and science communicators reach a growing, evolving, vibrant, diverse, and demanding audience. Results Players seem aware of the scientific content in NMS, with a positive attitude through it. But players showed problems identifying what is right and wrong, while also pointing to the idea that every videogame that deals with science should strive to treat it with evidence. 57% of the respondents answered that NMS motivated them to know more about chemistry, with more than 35% revealing that they learned something new and understood the role of some scientific fundaments in certain real-world situations like new energy sources, biomes, or the role of carbon and oxygen. Discussion and Conclusion With the growth of the videogames’ audience, educators, science communicators, scientists, and policymakers can find in the medium – in any shape or form – a fun and interactive ally to engage with younger audiences and promote dialogues that can be transformative around scientific topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Santos & Nelson Zagalo & Carla Morais, 2023. "Players Perception of the Chemistry in the Video Game No Man’s Sky," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(3), pages 375-394, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:54:y:2023:i:3:p:375-394
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781231169301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781231169301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781231169301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Entradas & Martin W Bauer & Colm O'Muircheartaigh & Frank Marcinkowski & Asako Okamura & Giuseppe Pellegrini & John Besley & Luisa Massarani & Pedro Russo & Anthony Dudo & Barbara Saracino & Car, 2020. "Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Alexander Kawrykow & Gary Roumanis & Alfred Kam & Daniel Kwak & Clarence Leung & Chu Wu & Eleyine Zarour & Phylo players & Luis Sarmenta & Mathieu Blanchette & Jérôme Waldispühl, 2012. "Phylo: A Citizen Science Approach for Improving Multiple Sequence Alignment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedikt Fecher & Freia Kuper & Birte Fähnrich & Hannah Schmid-Petri & Thomas Schildhauer & Peter Weingart & Holger Wormer, 2023. "Balancing interests between freedom and censorship: Organizational strategies for quality assurance in science communication," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 1-14.
    2. Matthew Staffelbach & Peter Sempolinski & Tracy Kijewski-Correa & Douglas Thain & Daniel Wei & Ahsan Kareem & Gregory Madey, 2015. "Lessons Learned from Crowdsourcing Complex Engineering Tasks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Yuanyuan Wang & Yang Zhang & Jianhua Hou & Bili Zheng, 2026. "Shaping scientific papers diffusion structure: academia and public in social media networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(2), pages 1037-1066, February.
    4. Naihui Zhou & Zachary D Siegel & Scott Zarecor & Nigel Lee & Darwin A Campbell & Carson M Andorf & Dan Nettleton & Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill & Baskar Ganapathysubramanian & Jonathan W Kelly & Iddo Fried, 2018. "Crowdsourcing image analysis for plant phenomics to generate ground truth data for machine learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Tobias Tönsfeuerborn & Katharina Hauck & Jonas Volle & David Kaldewey, 2026. "Navigating the two worlds of academic and public communication: the case of sociologists in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Abhay S. D. Rajput & Sangeeta Sharma, 2022. "Top Indian scientists as public communicators: a survey of their perceptions, attitudes and communication behaviors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3167-3192, June.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0143687 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mirjana Pejić Bach & Cristina M. Pulido & Dalia Suša Vugec & Vladia Ionescu & Gisela Redondo-Sama & Laura Ruiz-Eugenio, 2020. "Fostering Social Project Impact with Twitter: Current Usage and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, August.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0222579 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Andrei P. Kirilenko & Travis Desell & Hany Kim & Svetlana Stepchenkova, 2017. "Crowdsourcing Analysis of Twitter Data on Climate Change: Paid Workers vs. Volunteers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Thomas Scott & Christian Alan Paul Smethurst & Yvonne Westermaier & Moriz Mayer & Peter Greb & Roland Kousek & Tobias Biberger & Gerd Bader & Zuzana Jandova & Philipp S. Schmalhorst & Julian E. Fuchs , 2025. "Drugit: crowd-sourcing molecular design of non-peptidic VHL binders," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Marta Entradas & João M. Santos, 2021. "Returns of research funding are maximised in media visibility for excellent institutes," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:54:y:2023:i:3:p:375-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.