IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v52y2021i1p24-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Escape Room Blueprint: Central Orientation Contagion Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Jill L. McLaughlin
  • Jessica A. Reed
  • Jody Shiveley
  • Stephanie Lee

Abstract

Background: Turnover rate for new graduate nurses at a midwestern community hospital was 30% for the first two years. Central clinical orientation for new hire registered nurses and care assistants was heavily executed via didactic format. Feedback from instructors suggested boredom and disengagement of learners during these sessions. Post central orientation evaluations resulted in 49% of attendees feeling not “very confident†to apply skills in clinical practice. Methods: Clinical educators created an escape room to improve learner satisfaction, interprofessional communication, and confidence in applying skills in practice. A convenience sample of twenty-three (23) registered nurses and care assistants participated in an escape room , Contagion Crisis, covering basic knowledge of infection control, emergency response, restraints, and drug calculation. Results: Average Likert scores on the post survey for satisfaction and communication were 4.67 and 4.0 respectively. Confidence in applying skills to practice averaged 4.72. Subjective feedback from participants included enjoyment of a fun, non-pressure environment. Conclusion: Multiple clinical disciplines can use this escape room, as it covers topics from central hospital orientation . Learners preferred the escape room format versus a high-fidelity simulation, due to it being less “high stakes†and not a judgement of individual performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill L. McLaughlin & Jessica A. Reed & Jody Shiveley & Stephanie Lee, 2021. "Escape Room Blueprint: Central Orientation Contagion Crisis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(1), pages 24-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:1:p:24-30
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120954493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120954493
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120954493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:1:p:24-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.