IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i3p329-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (Not So) Evil Within? Agency in Video Game Choice and the Impact of Violent Content

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher J. Ferguson
  • Kay Colon-Motas
  • Carolin Esser
  • Connor Lanie
  • Skylar Purvis
  • Mark Williams

Abstract

Background . The degree to which violent video games do, or do not contribute to aggressive behavior and hostility remains controversial in the scientific community, with scholars not yet having come to a consensus about effects. Recent studies have examined whether other issues such as frustration or competition might explain some video game influences that were previously thought to be due to violent content. Aim . The current study examines whether player agency in determining choice of game played influences aggressive outcomes. Methods . Young adult players were randomized either to play a violent game, a non-violent game, or to be given the choice between several violent and non-violent games. Players were examined for subsequent aggressive behavior using the ice water task as well as for stress levels and hostility. Results . Game condition did not influence hostility, stress , or aggressive behavior, whether with randomized or chosen games. Conclusion . The present study provided no evidence that violent video games contribute to aggressive behavior. Lack of influence for agency in game choice can be understood given the lack of any aggression effect for violent game exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher J. Ferguson & Kay Colon-Motas & Carolin Esser & Connor Lanie & Skylar Purvis & Mark Williams, 2017. "The (Not So) Evil Within? Agency in Video Game Choice and the Impact of Violent Content," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(3), pages 329-337, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:3:p:329-337
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116683521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116683521
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116683521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:3:p:329-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.