IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v45y2014i4-5p528-547.html

Measuring Game Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Mikeal Martey
  • Kate Kenski
  • James Folkestad
  • Laurie Feldman
  • Elana Gordis
  • Adrienne Shaw
  • Jennifer Stromer-Galley
  • Ben Clegg
  • Hui Zhang
  • Nissim Kaufman
  • Ari N. Rabkin
  • Samira Shaikh
  • Tomek Strzalkowski

Abstract

Background . Engagement has been identified as a crucial component of learning in games research. However, the conceptualization and operationalization of engagement vary widely in the literature. Many valuable approaches illuminate ways in which presence , flow , arousal , participation , and other concepts constitute or contribute to engagement. However, few studies examine multiple conceptualizations of engagement in the same project. Method . This article discusses the results of two experiments that measure engagement in five different ways: survey self-report , content analyses of player videos, electro-dermal activity, mouse movements, and game click logs. We examine the relationships among these measures and assess how they are affected by the technical characteristics of a 30-minute, custom-built, educational game: use of a customized character , level of narrative complexity , and level of art complexity . Results . We found that the five measures of engagement correlated in limited ways, and that they revealed substantially different relationships with game characteristics. We conclude that engagement as a construct is more complex than is captured in any of these measures individually and that using multiple methods to assess engagement can illuminate aspects of engagement not detectable by a single method of measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Mikeal Martey & Kate Kenski & James Folkestad & Laurie Feldman & Elana Gordis & Adrienne Shaw & Jennifer Stromer-Galley & Ben Clegg & Hui Zhang & Nissim Kaufman & Ari N. Rabkin & Samira Shaikh & , 2014. "Measuring Game Engagement," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 528-547, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:528-547
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878114553575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878114553575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878114553575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Whitton & Alex Moseley, 2014. "Deconstructing Engagement," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 433-449, August.
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:515-537 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Daniel Steele & Edda Bild & Cynthia Tarlao & Catherine Guastavino, 2019. "Soundtracking the Public Space: Outcomes of the Musikiosk Soundscape Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, May.
    4. M. Eshaq Stanikzai & Ella Mittal, 2025. "Leveraging AI-generated and human-generated content for maximized user engagement in contentpreneurs’ innovation and creativity," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Yuntao Guo & Srinivas Peeta & Shubham Agrawal & Irina Benedyk, 2022. "Impacts of Pokémon GO on route and mode choice decisions: exploring the potential for integrating augmented reality, gamification, and social components in mobile apps to influence travel decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 395-444, April.
    6. Yanping Zhang & Changyong Liang & Ai Ren & Keqing Li, 2025. "User involvement and continuance intention in the context of lightweight applications: A motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Mariani, Marcello M. & Hashemi, Novin & Wirtz, Jochen, 2023. "Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 2018. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-257, April.
    9. Julia Troll & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees’ Engagement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 433-450, August.
    10. Alicia Heraz & Kiran Kumar Ashish Bhyravabhottla & Nandith Sajith, 2026. "Predicting user engagement levels through emotion-based gesture analysis of initial impressions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 705-721, February.
    11. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Adina Palea, 2021. "An Appraisal of Communication Practices Demonstrated by Romanian District Public Health Authorities at the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    12. David Sharek & Eric Wiebe, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through the Cognitive and Affective Dimensions," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 569-592, August.
    13. Afi Fouad El & Ouiddad Smail, 2021. "Consumer engagement in value co-creation within virtual video game communities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 370-386, December.
    14. Luca Longo, 2018. "Experienced mental workload, perception of usability, their interaction and impact on task performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.
    15. Zixing Shen & Michael J. Pritchard, 2022. "Cognitive engagement on social media: A study of the effects of visual cueing in educational videos," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1253-1267, September.
    16. Roy, Sumitra & Gupta, Vishnu & Ray, Samrat, 2023. "Adoption of AI chat bot like Chat GPT in higher education in India: a sem analysis approach," Economic environment, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, issue 4, pages 130-149.
    17. Shahbaznezhad, Hamidreza & Dolan, Rebecca & Rashidirad, Mona, 2021. "The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users' Engagement Behavior," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 47-65.
    18. Fang, Jiaming & Zhao, Zhirong & Wen, Chao & Wang, Ruping, 2017. "Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 269-283.
    19. Jezdancher Watti & Máté Millner & Kata Siklósi & Hedvig Kiss & Oguz Kelemen & Dávid Pócs, 2022. "Smokers’ Engagement Behavior on Facebook: Verbalizing and Visual Expressing the Smoking Cessation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Jian Zhang & Fang Liu, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Second Screen Synergy: Exploring the Socio-Economic Impact of Dual Screen Engagement in Television Consumption," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 20196-20228, December.
    21. Lin Shi & Katharine J. Mach & Sangwon Suh & Adam Brandt, 2022. "Functionality‐based life cycle assessment framework: An information and communication technologies (ICT) product case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 782-800, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:528-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.