IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v44y2013i4p493-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early-Determined Business Endgame Standings

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Wolfe
  • William D. Biggs
  • Steven C. Gold

Abstract

Teach and Patel reported that teams playing CAPSTONE arrived at their final financial standings early in the game. Based on this, they concluded that participants could feel the game was unfair and that further plays beyond the game’s early rounds might be counterproductive from a game-grade perspective, and even worse, from a learning perspective. Their study was repeated using 1,164 CAPSTONE firms in 194 competitions for 9,312 rounds of play. Their findings of early-determined first-place and last-place finishes were not confirmed based on either cumulative or round-by-round profits. The Teach and Patel research design was also applied to a larger scale game. The results found a company’s early results were low predictors of their final results which did not support the early-finish observation. Game users are cautioned that the educational benefits of any game depends on optimizing all aspects of the simulation’s teaching/learning environment and that competitive fluidity exists throughout a game’s duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Wolfe & William D. Biggs & Steven C. Gold, 2013. "Early-Determined Business Endgame Standings," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(4), pages 493-513, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:44:y:2013:i:4:p:493-513
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878113477056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878113477056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878113477056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:44:y:2013:i:4:p:493-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.