IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i2p2158244019840112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frameworks and Models for Disseminating Curated Research Outcomes to the Public

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Clifton-Ross
  • Ann Dale
  • Robert Newell

Abstract

In our post-truth society, mobilizing “facts†and “evidence†has never been more important. We live in an age that is paradoxically information rich due to the proliferation of Internet Communication Technologies (ICTs) and information poor due to the spread of misinformation. Academic research outcomes are traditionally disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and in the classroom; however, this research is not often effectively communicated to both decision makers and the general public(s). There is no perfect way of disseminating research outcomes; however, there are lessons to be learned from curatorial and communication frameworks developed in museums as these institutions have a long history educating and engaging the public. This article explores the new concept of “research curation,†or rather the enhanced dissemination of curated research outcomes to reach diverse audiences. Closing the “gap†between academia and the public is essential for increasing civic literacy around issues that threaten sustainability. By adapting curatorial and communication methods developed in museums along with ICT models, the practice of “research curation†can be an effective framework for improved dissemination of academic knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Clifton-Ross & Ann Dale & Robert Newell, 2019. "Frameworks and Models for Disseminating Curated Research Outcomes to the Public," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019840112
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019840112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019840112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019840112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019840112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.