IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v8y2018i4p2158244018809149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing the Good Participatory Practice Guidelines in the Girls Achieve Power Trial in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • A. Kutywayo
  • C. S. Yah
  • N. P. Naidoo
  • M. Malotana
  • S. Dyani
  • S. Mullick

Abstract

The Good Participatory Practice (GPP) guidelines provide a framework for stakeholder engagement within clinical trials, to ensure a study’s acceptability, feasibility, and improving the overall research quality; however, they have rarely been applied beyond this setting, and no literature exists on its application in adolescent research. A review of the 2011 GPP guidelines was undertaken to identify which 16 GPP topic areas could be applied and adapted for implementing an ecological asset building intervention, that is, the Girls Achieve Power (GAP Year) cluster randomized controlled trial for reducing school dropout and increasing reporting of gender-based violence in Gauteng and Western Cape province in South Africa. The 16 GPP topic areas were adapted and implemented to guide stakeholder engagement for GAP Year. We show the usability and adaptability of the GPP framework for guiding stakeholder engagement in non-clinical trials like GAP Year; however it requires adapting to respond to the unique needs of the beneficiaries.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Kutywayo & C. S. Yah & N. P. Naidoo & M. Malotana & S. Dyani & S. Mullick, 2018. "Implementing the Good Participatory Practice Guidelines in the Girls Achieve Power Trial in South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:2158244018809149
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244018809149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244018809149
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244018809149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:2158244018809149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.