IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v7y2017i3p2158244017734024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating Chinese EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills: The Contributions of Teaching Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Wang
  • Sirinthorn Seepho

Abstract

Many teaching strategies have been used to promote the development of critical thinking skills, among which the most frequently used are group discussion, concept mapping, and analytical questioning. The study aims to explore learners’ voice and learning experience in the pedagogical contributions of these strategies to the development of critical thinking skills in Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners. One full university class was chosen as the sample in the instruction of critical thinking skills and to take part in a learner voice survey, among which 15 participants were chosen by purposeful sampling for semistructured interviews. The instruction of critical thinking was embedded in an English reading class by using the three teaching strategies, during which four interviews were conducted for each critical thinking skill. After the instruction of critical thinking skills was completed, all participants were surveyed with the learner voice questionnaire. The results show that participants thought the three teaching strategies could improve critical thinking skills. Each teaching strategy made unique and specific contributions to the development of critical thinking skills. These findings have pedagogical implications for using these teaching strategies in the instruction of critical thinking skills in Chinese EFL learners.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Wang & Sirinthorn Seepho, 2017. "Facilitating Chinese EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills: The Contributions of Teaching Strategies," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017734024
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017734024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017734024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017734024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017734024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.