IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v7y2017i3p2158244017730596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probing the Effects of Task Types on EFL Learners’ Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge: The Case of Involvement Load Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Maryam Tahmasbi
  • Mohammad Taghi Farvardin

Abstract

This study examined the effects of task types on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. To this end, 130 (70 female and 60 male) EFL learners were randomly assigned to one of six tasks of learning 30 target words. The design of the tasks was based on the involvement load hypothesis (ILH) arguing that learning of unfamiliar words to be contingent on the amount of task induced involvement. The components of involvement in ILH include need (N), search (S), and evaluation (E). In this study, the tasks induced the same or different involvement loads regarding the presence and strength of each component: paragraph writing (+N, +S, ++E), sentence writing (+N, +S, +E), combining (+N, –S, +E), fill in the blank (+N, –S, +E), translation (+N, –S, +E), and control (–N, –S, –E). After the last treatment session, both receptive and productive knowledge of the target words were measured. Moreover, a delayed posttest was administered 1 month later. The results revealed that all output tasks were more effective than the control task in enhancing the participants’ receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. Moreover, paragraph writing task was found to be the most effective task.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryam Tahmasbi & Mohammad Taghi Farvardin, 2017. "Probing the Effects of Task Types on EFL Learners’ Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge: The Case of Involvement Load Hypothesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017730596
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017730596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017730596
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017730596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ehsan Namaziandost & Murad Hassan Mohammed Sawalmeh & Shouket Ahmad Tilwani & Meisam Ziafar & Arin Arianti & Ronald M. Hernández & Oleg Anatolevich Razzhivin & Yolvi Ocaña-Fernández & Doris Fuster-, 2021. "Manipulation of the Involvement Load of L2 Reading Tasks: A Useful Heuristic for Enhanced L2 Vocabulary Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017730596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.