IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v6y2016i3p2158244016669550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Modality Matter? The Effects of Reading, Listening, and Dual Modality on Comprehension

Author

Listed:
  • Beth A. Rogowsky
  • Barbara M. Calhoun
  • Paula Tallal

Abstract

With advancing technology, there is increasing interest in differences between listening versus reading comprehension or doing both simultaneously. Ninety-one participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups that received the same instructional material (the preface and a chapter from a non-fiction book), but each in a different input modality (digital audiobook, e-text, dual modality). After completing the material, participants took the same comprehension test in written form to establish both immediate comprehension (Time 1) and 2-week retention (Time 2). No statistically significant differences were found for any analyses pertaining to effects of the three different instructional conditions on comprehension at Time 1 or Time 2. Additional analyses showed that both males and females in each condition recalled an equal amount of information, regardless of whether they listened to an audiobook, read from an electronic tablet, or both listened and read simultaneously (dual modality).

Suggested Citation

  • Beth A. Rogowsky & Barbara M. Calhoun & Paula Tallal, 2016. "Does Modality Matter? The Effects of Reading, Listening, and Dual Modality on Comprehension," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:3:p:2158244016669550
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244016669550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016669550
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244016669550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:3:p:2158244016669550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.