IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v5y2015i1p2158244015574938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistency Between Beliefs and Behavior Regarding Use of Substances in Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Ann Kaskutas
  • Lois A. Ritter

Abstract

This article addresses the assumption that pathways to recovery from substance abuse and dependence, and the language used to define one’s relationship to substances, translate to actual beliefs and behaviors in terms of substance use. We draw on social representation theory and use data from a large web-based study ( N = 9,341) whose goal was to understand how individuals in recovery define what recovery means to them. We often hear people say that they are “in recovery,†and present findings now provide empirical evidence of the prevalent meanings of this ubiquitous expression. The belief that recovery is abstinence was broadly held in our sample, especially among those exposed to treatment and 12-step self-help groups and who define themselves as in recovery —and most (but not all) of such individuals are complete abstainers (no alcohol or drugs). In contrast, among the “self-changers†who did not attend treatment or self-help groups, the most common self-definition was used to have an alcohol or drug problem but don’t any more , half of whom believe that recovery is abstinence while half do not, and only one third are abstainers. Findings are of public health relevance, as it is estimated that among American adults alone, 10% report having had alcohol or drug problems but no longer do. In line with the central concepts of social representation theory, people’s pathways to recovery have a strong effect on how they define themselves and their behaviors and beliefs, but it is not universal.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Ann Kaskutas & Lois A. Ritter, 2015. "Consistency Between Beliefs and Behavior Regarding Use of Substances in Recovery," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:2158244015574938
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244015574938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015574938
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244015574938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:2158244015574938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.