IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i4p2158244014551930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Processing Instruction on the Recognition and Production of English Derivational Affixes Among EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Sasan Baleghizadeh
  • Arash Saharkhiz

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of processing instruction (PI) as opposed to traditional deductive exercise-based intervention (TI) in teaching English derivational affixes. There was also a comparison non-intervention (NI) group, and the groups were posttested. To teach the target affixes via PI, new structured input tasks were developed. In all, 101 adult male and female lower-intermediate participants initially took part in the study, but this was later reduced to 71 as a result of the pretest, and so on. The results were analyzed through MANOVA and paired t test. In recognition, PI and TI outperformed non-intervention, while PI and TI did not outperform one another. In production, TI outperformed the other groups, while the other groups did not outperform one another. More studies must be carried out before drawing any conclusions about the transferability of PI to output activities for teaching derivational affixes. The students were also interviewed to survey their attitudes. Affectively, PI created self-confidence and an enjoyable atmosphere among the learners. Also cognitively, PI was the only group that satisfied the participants in their ability to recognize and produce derivational affixes. We found PI a highly effective and positive approach for teaching recognizing derivational affixes. We also believe it to possess a high potential for teaching their production, as it gave the participants a good sense of self-confidence for the production of the affixes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sasan Baleghizadeh & Arash Saharkhiz, 2014. "The Impact of Processing Instruction on the Recognition and Production of English Derivational Affixes Among EFL Learners," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:2158244014551930
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014551930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014551930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014551930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:2158244014551930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.