IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v1y2011i1p2158244011410324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallels in the Beliefs and Works of Margaret Fuller and Carl Jung

Author

Listed:
  • Jerry Aldridge
  • Jennifer L. Kilgo
  • Melissa Werner
  • Lois M. Christensen

Abstract

Margaret Fuller, the 19th-century feminist and Transcendentalist, has been compared with Louisa May Alcott, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Henry David Thoreau. The life and theories of Carl Jung, the 20th-century psychiatrist, have been compared with the works of Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, Jean Piaget, and Sabina Spielrein among others. However, no comparisons have been published concerning the beliefs and works of Fuller and Jung. The purpose of this research was to compare and contrast the beliefs and written works of Margaret Fuller and Carl Jung. Similarities and differences were reported among their ideologies. Similarities in their childhood and adult dreams, literary references, spiritual beliefs, and explorations of gender were described. Differences were reported, which included the focus of their writings and their ideas about who is to blame when things go wrong, and how to deal with the individual daemon in each person was also explored. Special consideration was given to how closely their writings intersect. Specifically, the authors questioned whether Jung was inspired by the ideas and writings of Fuller. To answer this question, five possibilities were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry Aldridge & Jennifer L. Kilgo & Melissa Werner & Lois M. Christensen, 2011. "Parallels in the Beliefs and Works of Margaret Fuller and Carl Jung," SAGE Open, , vol. 1(1), pages 21582440114, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:1:y:2011:i:1:p:2158244011410324
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244011410324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244011410324
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244011410324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:1:y:2011:i:1:p:2158244011410324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.