Author
Listed:
- Yanping Sun
- Yang Liu
- Jie Hu
Abstract
This study investigates the current state of interdisciplinarity within undergraduate English language major curricula in Chinese public universities, 7 years after the implementation of the National Quality Criteria for Undergraduate Teaching (Foreign Language Majors) ( NQC ). Grounded in integrationist theories of interdisciplinarity (Repko, Newell), this research conceptualizes interdisciplinarity as the structured integration of five academic disciplines: English language linguistics, English language literature, translation, comparative literature and transcultural studies, and international and regional studies. Drawing on responses from 1,210 students across eight universities, this study develops five empirically grounded and psychometrically validated competence scales, which are then employed in a series of multiple regression analyses to assess interrelationships among disciplinary domains. The findings indicate a generally high level of student-reported academic competence and significant positive associations among most disciplines—particularly in literature studies—suggesting substantive interdisciplinary integration. Moreover, notable disjunctions remain, especially within the subdimensions of translation practice, phonetics, and historical cognition. These patterns underscore both the achievements and the ongoing challenges of recent curricular reforms, and point to specific areas where deeper interdisciplinary alignment may be pursued. By introducing a set of robust disciplinary competence measures and demonstrating their utility in mapping curricular integration, this study offers a methodological framework that may inform future research on interdisciplinarity in diverse educational settings.
Suggested Citation
Yanping Sun & Yang Liu & Jie Hu, 2025.
"The Evaluation of Undergraduate English Language Major Curriculum Interdisciplinarity in China,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251382544
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251382544
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251382544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.