IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251382154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust in E-government as a Tool to Shape Political Trust Between Urban and Rural Residents: An Empirical Study Based on Trust Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Xuling Lin
  • Rongcan Zeng

Abstract

The adoption of e-government is regarded as a potential way to improve people’s trust in government. However, due to the digital divide rooted in urban-rural divide, the impacts of e-government use on urban and rural residents’ political trust might be different. This is one of the earliest research that concentrates on this problem. The objective of this research is to understand whether trust in e-government services has significant impacts on urban and rural residents’ political trust. A conceptual framework was constructed to investigate the relationship between citizens’ trust in e-government services and their overall political trust based on trust theories and previous literature of e-government, including institutional-based trust, process-based trust, characteristic-based trust and other factors. The conceptual framework was tested via a survey of 539 urban residents and 409 rural residents in Chongqing. The findings indicate that trust in e-government services has overall significant and positive impacts on both urban residents’ and rural residents’ political trust. In addition, structure assurance and familiarity only have impacts on urban users, while expectation confirmation toward e-government and reciprocity of liking greatly affect both two groups. Moreover, perceived characteristics similarity has significant negative effects on rural residents, but not urban citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuling Lin & Rongcan Zeng, 2025. "Trust in E-government as a Tool to Shape Political Trust Between Urban and Rural Residents: An Empirical Study Based on Trust Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251382154
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251382154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251382154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251382154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251382154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.