IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251381154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validating a Multi-Dimensional Rating Scale for Lexical Proficiency in L2 Academic Speech: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyu Jiang
  • Hua Chen

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate an analytical rating scale specifically designed to assess the lexical proficiency of Chinese college students in Academic English speaking tasks. A multi-layer construct of lexical proficiency was first developed and operationalized into an eight-dimension rating scale, including word diversity, word sophistication, word accuracy, and word fluency, phraseological diversity, phraseological sophistication, phraseological accuracy, and phraseological fluency. The reliability and validity of the scale were then examined by using the many-facet Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis with 600 academic speech samples. The results showed that the rating scale could successfully and reliably differentiate levels of lexical proficiency among participants. High construct validity was confirmed with excellent model fit and support for the proposed dimensions. The proposed analytical rating scale provides a practical approach to comprehensively assessing lexical proficiency in academic speaking contexts. The study has implications for L2 vocabulary instruction, assessment, and speaking assessment in L2 academic contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyu Jiang & Hua Chen, 2025. "Validating a Multi-Dimensional Rating Scale for Lexical Proficiency in L2 Academic Speech: A Mixed-Methods Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251381154
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251381154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251381154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251381154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251381154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.