IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251380712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Exchange through Film: Analyzing Chinese Audiences’ Reception of Japanese and South Korean Cinema

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Yaqoub
  • Ze Gao

Abstract

This study empirically examines the cultural soft power effectiveness of Japanese and Korean films in China, focusing on the audience attraction mechanism from the perspective of cultural diplomacy. A mixed-method approach was adopted to conduct a cross-sectional survey of 1,942 Chinese film fans, and thematic analysis was used to deconstruct the underlying cultural dynamics. The core findings of this study mainly include three aspects: Japanese films trigger high emotional resonance with their everyday realist narratives, and their effect on enhancing cultural awareness significantly surpasses that of Korean films; emotional proximity is the core mechanism, establishing non-political connections through micro-narrative life symbols to dispel geopolitical hostility; although Korean films enjoy a proximity to Confucian culture, their credibility is undermined by excessive dramatization, and they are counterattacked by Japan’s “hyperrealistic approach†with low cultural proximity. This study verifies the paradox of East Asian cultural acceptance: in the context of historical trauma, high cultural proximity tends to activate political defense, whereas emotional proximity can penetrate this barrier. This study proposes a three-dimensional soft power transformation path, namely, using everyday realism as the emotional foundation, intergenerational tension of values to achieve traditional reinvention, and technological aesthetic immersion to construct sensory conquest.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Yaqoub & Ze Gao, 2025. "Cultural Exchange through Film: Analyzing Chinese Audiences’ Reception of Japanese and South Korean Cinema," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251380712
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251380712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251380712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251380712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251380712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.