IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251379513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Did You Leave? A Content Analysis of Comments to Former Teacher Posts on TikTok

Author

Listed:
  • Forrest Kaiser
  • Jennifer Lane

Abstract

Motivations for commenting on social media vary greatly and are driven by multiple factors including personal interests, political leaning, and algorithmic influence. This study used a thematic content analysis of comments on the TikTok platform to explore how users respond to videos created by former teachers sharing their stories of leaving the profession. Comment data were collected from a sample of posts explicitly sharing narratives of leaving and analyzed through a four-step mixed methods process. The researchers noted that words of affirmation had the highest representation in all comments, and included thoughts of encouragement, solidarity, acknowledgment, confirmation, and support. Users seeking connections had the next highest representation and involved user responses to extend the post to different situations, build on the ideas conveyed, or share personal feelings. Finally, discussions on self-care were the third highest and represented comments that focused on taking care of personal needs and thinking of self apart from a profession. By analyzing comments and engagement metrics, the study revealed key patterns on how users connect with others, express support, share personal experiences, and engage in discussions. The findings may offer insights into how social media platforms like TikTok may serve as spaces for emotional support, critical discourse, and the amplification of systemic issues within the education sector. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature on digital engagement and its implications for understanding educational challenges like teacher turnover.

Suggested Citation

  • Forrest Kaiser & Jennifer Lane, 2025. "Why Did You Leave? A Content Analysis of Comments to Former Teacher Posts on TikTok," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251379513
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251379513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251379513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251379513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251379513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.