IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251378212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Speaks, Who Listens? Gendered Speech Styles in Will Smith’s Interview with Ellen

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Yang
  • Mingxing Yang

Abstract

Prior research on gendered language has primarily focused on everyday conversations and workplace discourse. However, media interviews, where gender intersects with institutional roles and performative identities, remain understudied, particularly from the perspective of Conversation Analysis. This qualitative study addresses this gap by examining a 10-min segment from Will Smith’s Full Interview with Ellen. Using conversation analysis, supported by summative content and comparative analysis, the study explores how gendered speech patterns manifest in a media interview setting. The analysis focuses on five linguistic dimensions: lexical patterns, sentence complexity, assertiveness, interruptions and politeness, and turn-taking strategies. Findings confirm several established gendered language norms: the male speaker exhibits greater assertiveness, topic control, and frequency of interruptions, while the female speaker employs more facilitative, polite, and cooperative strategies. However, these patterns are shaped not only by gender but also by Ellen DeGeneres’s institutional role as host and her identity as an openly lesbian public figure. The study contributes to the understanding of how conversational dominance and linguistic politeness are co-constructed in media discourse. It highlights the need for more context-sensitive approaches to gender and language research, especially in mediated settings where identity, institutional roles, and audience expectations interact.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Yang & Mingxing Yang, 2025. "Who Speaks, Who Listens? Gendered Speech Styles in Will Smith’s Interview with Ellen," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251378212
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251378212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251378212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251378212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251378212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.