Author
Abstract
English learning contexts are typically categorized as English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL). ESL pertains to English acquisition in regions where it is an official language, while EFL refers to contexts where it is not. Although previous research has examined written language differences among learners in L1 and L2 settings, most studies have focused on monolingual L2 contexts, with limited attention to bilingual environments like Hong Kong. This comparative study investigates the compositions of Chinese ESL students from senior secondary schools in Hong Kong and their EFL counterparts from Mainland of China, aiming to identify differences in linguistic features and influencing factors. The analysis of persuasive writing performance utilizes measures of lexical richness and syntactic complexity across 10 dimensions: lexical diversity, sophistication, density, syntactic complexity, accuracy, writing fluency, connective ratio, content word overlap, and latent semantic analysis. Results indicate significant differences in six indicators. Mainland students excel in lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and syntactic accuracy, reflecting superior mastery of vocabulary and syntax. In contrast, Hong Kong students outperform in lexical accuracy, writing fluency, and content word overlap, highlighting their strengths in diction, lexical appropriateness, and readability. These findings underscore the varying impacts of official curriculum requirements, vocabulary and sentence structure instruction, and writing pedagogies in these distinct learning contexts.
Suggested Citation
Chao Zhang & Ruoxi Li, 2025.
"A Study on Linguistic Features of Chinese ESL and EFL Learners’ Writing: A Learning Context Perspective,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251378082
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251378082
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251378082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.