IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251377881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding University Students’ Acceptance and Use of Fragmented Academic Reading: An Extension of the UTAUT2 Model

Author

Listed:
  • Maoyan She
  • Yiyang Xu
  • Yuyan Luo
  • Peng Hu

Abstract

With the global rise of digital education, fragmented academic reading has attracted increasing attention, as an emerging learning mode among university students in various countries. This study explores the factors influencing university students’ acceptance and use of fragmented academic reading through a comprehensive framework that integrates the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Behavior of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) with several key individual factors, including utilization of fragmented time, self-efficacy, and reading habit. 395 valid samples were collected from Chinese undergraduates through a well-structured online questionnaire survey, and the Structural Equation Modeling with Analysis of Moment Structures software were used to test the hypotheses. The results revealed that effort expectancy, utilization of fragmented time, and facilitating conditions positively affected university students’ behavioral intentions, with facilitating conditions exerting the most potent effect, and especially among science and engineering students. Nonetheless, the impact of performance expectancy and social influence differs across ages, genders, and disciplines; primarily, intentions of female, senior and humanities and social sciences students are positively affected. Moreover, behavioral intention, self-efficacy, and reading habit significantly affected university students’ use behaviors. Furthermore, self-efficacy can positively moderate the relationship between the utilization of fragmented time and behavioral intention, and the relationship between reading habit and use behaviors. This study contributes to the literature on traditional academic reading and general fragmented reading, extends the scope of the UTAUT2 model to informal reading settings, and provides valuable insights for guiding university students’ learning behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Maoyan She & Yiyang Xu & Yuyan Luo & Peng Hu, 2025. "Understanding University Students’ Acceptance and Use of Fragmented Academic Reading: An Extension of the UTAUT2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251377881
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251377881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251377881
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251377881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251377881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.