Author
Listed:
- Juan Carlos Armijos
- Jesus Juyumaya
- Mauricio Di Rocco
- Karina Isla
Abstract
This study updates the existing knowledge on the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) through a bibliometric analysis, providing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on the topic. The main objective is to refresh previous bibliometric research by examining the volume, quality, and structure of publications related to BSC. Data were collected from Scopus and Web of Science—two databases known for their accuracy and reliability—covering articles published from 1992, the year BSC was introduced, through January 2025. The final sample includes 2,215 articles from Scopus and 2,427 from Web of Science. The findings reveal a growing academic interest in BSC, reflected in an increasingly broad and diverse body of literature. Kaplan and Norton are identified as the most prolific authors, while the United States leads in terms of the number of publications and citations. “Balanced Scorecard†is the most frequently used keyword in this field. This study extends previous bibliometric analyses by incorporating more recent data and a wider set of indicators, which helps to identify emerging trends and developments in BSC research. However, the analysis is limited to articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, which may exclude relevant contributions from other sources. From a practical perspective, the research offers valuable insights into key contributors and emerging trends, guiding future research and applications of BSC in performance management. On a societal level, it underscores the BSC’s potential to enhance organizational performance and decision-making processes, contributing to improved efficiency and effectiveness across various sectors.
Suggested Citation
Juan Carlos Armijos & Jesus Juyumaya & Mauricio Di Rocco & Karina Isla, 2025.
"A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on the Balanced Scorecard,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251375677
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251375677
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251375677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.