IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251375167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Development of a Midlife Crisis Questionnaire (MLC-Q): A Dual Approach Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Geemol John
  • Mohammad Amin Wani

Abstract

This study intended to construct a standardized comprehensive questionnaire for assessing midlife crises in middle-aged people. There were a total of 519 middle-aged participants. For exploratory factor analysis, 252 samples were utilized, and for confirmatory factor analysis, 267 samples. An initial pool of 63 items was generated using the theoretical and conceptual insights found in the literature. Following a comprehensive EFA and CFA with good factor loadings, communalities, model fit, reliability, and validity, the number of items was ultimately lowered to 27. The final questionnaire provided a five-factor model, namely, Physical health and Changes, Identity and Self-Reflection, Emotional Distress, Relationship Evaluation, Career, Social Comparisons, and Worries about Mortality. The five factors demonstrated strong internal consistency and validity indices and are shown to be connected and interdependent. Confirmatory factor analysis further strengthened the association of latent variables. This questionnaire is a novel and effective tool that addresses several of the midlife crisis issues that middle-aged persons encounter. Researchers, psychologists, and clinicians can use this questionnaire to help recognize and measure middle-age crises to apply the necessary interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Geemol John & Mohammad Amin Wani, 2025. "Psychometric Development of a Midlife Crisis Questionnaire (MLC-Q): A Dual Approach Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251375167
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251375167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251375167
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251375167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251375167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.