IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251374520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Cross-Cultural Thinking Styles and Student Roles in CSCL

Author

Listed:
  • Kewei Ning
  • Enwei Xu

Abstract

Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is considered an effective strategy for knowledge construction, and research on CSCL in cross-cultural contexts is of great significance for improving the knowledge construction and learning outcomes in minority regions. This study focuses on the relationship between thinking styles and role selection tendencies among Uyghur and Han students in a CSCL environment in a cross-cultural context. Using the Thinking Style Scale, the study surveyed 82 Uyghur and Han students in the second year of junior high school at No. 23 Middle School in Urumqi, Xinjiang, and revealed significant differences and correlations in their thinking styles and role selection in CSCL learning. The study also explains the mechanisms behind the differences in thinking styles and role choices from the perspective of cultural adaptation theory. The findings are as follows: (1) There are significant differences in thinking styles between Uyghur and Han students in a cross-cultural context. (2) Uyghur and Han students show different tendencies in role selection during CSCL learning. (3) There is a significant correlation between specific thinking styles and specific role selections among Uyghur and Han students in a cross-cultural context. The results not only enrich the theoretical foundation of cross-cultural education but also provide new perspectives and strategies for role allocation and instructional design in CSCL practice, contributing to the enhancement of ethnic unity, mutual assistance, and integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Kewei Ning & Enwei Xu, 2025. "The Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Cross-Cultural Thinking Styles and Student Roles in CSCL," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251374520
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251374520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251374520
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251374520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251374520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.