IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251374486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Corpus-Based Judicial Vocabulary List

Author

Listed:
  • Guangquan Hu
  • Jinying Guo
  • Lei Liu

Abstract

This study develops a Judicial Vocabulary List (JVL) based on the United States Supreme Court Decision Corpus (SCDC) from 1999 to 2023, addressing the lack of specialized vocabulary resources for legal English. Using Python, we analyzed the SCDC through statistical measures such as normalized frequency, range ratio, dispersion, and frequency ratio to identify high-frequency lemmas. The final JVL comprises 943 lemmas, primarily nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs, covering 22.15% of Supreme Court decision texts. These vocabulary items are essential for understanding American case law. Data collection involved downloading Supreme Court decisions from the official website and cross-referencing them with the LexisNexis database to ensure accuracy. Text processing and cleaning were performed using Python libraries, and the corpus was analyzed using the Spacy library for lemmatization and part-of-speech tagging. Harvard Law Corpus (HLC) and Black’s Law Dictionary served as a reference to validate the relevance of JVL. The JVL is designed to assist legal English learners, particularly non-native English speakers, in mastering core legal concepts. It also provides educators with a resource to design targeted teaching materials and aids researchers in categorizing and analyzing Supreme Court decisions by legal domain or specific issues. The findings underscore the importance of domain-specific vocabulary in legal education and practice, offering a valuable tool for legal professionals and scholars to study Supreme Court decisions effectively. This research contributes to legal linguistics by providing a detailed, corpus-based vocabulary list that reflects the unique lexical features of Supreme Court decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangquan Hu & Jinying Guo & Lei Liu, 2025. "A Corpus-Based Judicial Vocabulary List," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251374486
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251374486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251374486
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251374486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251374486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.