IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251372266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair Assessment of Logical Ability in Military Selection: A Rasch Analysis of a Paper Fold and Cut Test

Author

Listed:
  • Emelie Wahlkrantz
  • Jeanette Melin

Abstract

Intelligence tests often play a vital role in selection processes across various domains, including those for basic military training. However, intelligence tests have also been criticized for being unfair and biased. The Swedish Enlistment Battery (SEB) serves as a tool for evaluating cognitive aptitude and is currently undergoing updates to ensure robust measurement properties and equity in selection for conscription. This article introduces a new addition to the SEB, termed the Paper Fold and Cut (PFC) test. The PFC test initially comprised 14 items intended to assess logical reasoning with visuospatial elements by presenting participants with images of folded and cut paper, requiring them to discern the correct outcome upon unfolding. Data was gathered from individuals ( N  = 1,262) undergoing testing for conscription (71% men, 91% aged 17–19 years, 15% voluntary and 12% with immigrant background). Employing Rasch analysis, when two misfitting items were removed the PFC test demonstrated sound measurement properties; acceptable fit statistics, support for unidimensional trait, absence of differential item functioning (DIF) and local dependence (LD), as well as adequate targeting and person separation index (PSI). Consequently, the PFC test emerges as a robust and unbiased tool for assessing logical ability among conscripts.

Suggested Citation

  • Emelie Wahlkrantz & Jeanette Melin, 2025. "Fair Assessment of Logical Ability in Military Selection: A Rasch Analysis of a Paper Fold and Cut Test," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251372266
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251372266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251372266
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251372266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251372266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.