IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251369559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Sentiment Indicators Improve Algorithmic Trading Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Raúl Gómez-Martínez
  • María Luisa Medrano-García
  • David López-López
  • Jose Torres-Pruñonosa

Abstract

This study explores the hypothesis that sentiment indicators can enhance the performance of algorithmic trading strategies. Specifically, we investigate the impact of incorporating investor sentiment metrics, such as the CNN Fear & Greed Index and cryptocurrency sentiment, on predictive accuracy and profitability. To test this hypothesis, two trading strategies are compared in the Nasdaq Mini futures market. The first strategy employs traditional technical indicators and machine learning models, whereas sentiment-based indicators are incorporated to the second one to enhance it. Backtests are conducted over the period from May 16, 2022 to December 20, 2024, to evaluate the effectiveness of sentiment signals. The results demonstrate that the sentiment-augmented strategy improves risk-adjusted returns, reduces volatility, and enhances profitability compared to the baseline model. This study provides evidence that sentiment indicators can be a valuable addition to algorithmic trading systems, offering a more stable and risk-managed approach, even though they may not always maximise net profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Raúl Gómez-Martínez & María Luisa Medrano-García & David López-López & Jose Torres-Pruñonosa, 2025. "How Sentiment Indicators Improve Algorithmic Trading Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251369559
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251369559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251369559
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251369559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251369559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.