Author
Listed:
- Almaw Genet Yeshiwas
- Tilahun Degu Tsega
- Chalachew Yenew
- Amare Mebrat Delie
- Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem
- Denekew Tenaw Anley
- Abathun Temesgen
- Molla Getie Mehari
- Amare Genetu Ejigu
- Gashaw Melkie Bayeh
Abstract
The sporadic mpox disease outbreak in Africa poses a global public health challenge. Although vaccines have been developed to combat the disease, its acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) varies across nations. This study aims to estimate the pooled mpox vaccine acceptance among HCWs and its associated factors. Databases and JBI appraisal checklist were used to include 21 studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias were checked with the I 2 test and funnel plot, respectively. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to estimate mpox vaccine acceptance among HCWs. The Eggers and Beggs test was computed to see if there is small study effect. This review included 21 studies with 13,969 participants. The overall pooled prevalence of HCWs’ mpox vaccines acceptance was 53.43% (95% CI [41.67, 65.19]). The HCWs with vaccine eagerness (OR: 4.78 [2.35, 7.21]), previous COVID-19 infections (OR: 1.47 [1.24, 1.69]), public health risk concern about mpox disease (OR: 3.57 [1.68, 5.46]), and good knowledge scores (OR: 2.04 [1.67, 2.41]) had higher odds of willing to receive mpox vaccines. However, HCWs who did not apply tighter infection prevention and control measures had reduced odds of mpox vaccine acceptance (OR: 0.59 [0.30, 0.87]). The acceptance of mpox vaccine among HCWs was still low worldwide. Therefore, national health ministries and global actors should prioritize the factors identified in this study, including providing training and enforcing crucial vaccine intervention strategies among high-risk groups.
Suggested Citation
Almaw Genet Yeshiwas & Tilahun Degu Tsega & Chalachew Yenew & Amare Mebrat Delie & Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem & Denekew Tenaw Anley & Abathun Temesgen & Molla Getie Mehari & Amare Genetu Ejigu & Gashaw Melk, 2025.
"Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccines Acceptance Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251368747
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251368747
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251368747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.