Author
Listed:
- Yisi Xue
- Jun Cai
- Qiuli Lin
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the design elements of Chinese dragon patterns and the emotional responses and preferences of participants, while exploring esthetic differences between novice and professional groups. We employed the E-prime method and multiple linear regression analysis to examine the visual features that elicit emotional responses and preferences among participants. A total of 100 college students were categorized into novice and professional groups based on their expertise in traditional patterns and evaluated a series of dragon pattern stimuli using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) scale. The findings revealed a significant correlation between the design elements of dragon patterns and participants’ expertise, emotional responses, and preferences. Shape variations in dragons were more likely to elicit emotional responses in the novice group, influencing preference choices, while simplified designs evoked emotional responses in the professional group. Notably, the use of circular borders in dragon patterns significantly impacted the emotional responses and preference evaluations of both groups. This study provides valuable insights into the modernization of dragon pattern design and contributes to the preservation and sustainability of Chinese culture. The universal preference for circular borders in dragon patterns suggests a commonality in esthetic appreciation, highlighting the significance of understanding cultural-specific esthetics in design practices. The research fills a gap in the literature regarding the association between preferences and esthetic emotional feedback toward traditional Chinese pattern design elements and offers a theoretical foundation for future research exploring esthetic differences and emotional experiences across different cultural backgrounds.
Suggested Citation
Yisi Xue & Jun Cai & Qiuli Lin, 2025.
"The Relationship Between Preference and Emotional Response of Different Type of Chinese Dragon Patterns: Expertise Matters,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367558
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251367558
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.