IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251367507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Open Conversations? A Generic Study of the Grammatical Forms, Sentential Types, Semantic Categories, and Social Actions of English Conversation Openings

Author

Listed:
  • Min Li
  • Yingying Chen

Abstract

Conversation openings are crucial for effective daily communication. However, existing research predominantly focuses on their sequential structures, with little attention given to their linguistic features and variations across different genres. To address this gap, the present study examines conversation openings from four perspectives (i.e., grammatical forms, sentential types, semantic categories, and social actions) by constructing a corpus of English TV dramas. The corpus comprises dialogues from popular TV series shown in recent years with high Internet Movie Database (IMDb) ratings, totaling 530 conversation openings in three generic settings: educational, medical, and judicial. To ensure data accuracy and reliability, the study employed comprehensive data processing and rigorous analysis using software tools such as AntConc 3.5 and IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. The findings reveal that full sentences are more prevalent than elliptical ones, with declarative and interrogative sentences being the most frequently used. Speakers tend to favor other-oriented utterances, with requests and greetings emerging as the most common social actions. Additionally, the study identifies significant influences of factors such as gender, familiarity, and social status on the structure and use of conversation openings.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Li & Yingying Chen, 2025. "How to Open Conversations? A Generic Study of the Grammatical Forms, Sentential Types, Semantic Categories, and Social Actions of English Conversation Openings," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367507
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251367507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251367507
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251367507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.