IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251367156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Occupational Identity Weaken the Effect of Stigma? Empirical Evidence of the Impact of Occupational Stigma on China’s Gig Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Jianling Zhang
  • Gukseong Lee

Abstract

Existing literature has focused on the impact of occupational stigma in traditional industries; however, limited research investigates how occupational stigma and identity affect employee performance within the gig economy. Thus, this study examines the causes of stigma and the barriers faced by workers in the gig economy. Using a survey of 400 food delivery workers in China, this study investigates how occupational stigma affects employee performance and turnover intentions. It also examines the roles that workplace well-being and professional identity play in this process. Using structural equation modeling, the findings indicate that participants’ higher perceived stigma is associated with reduced workplace well-being, which in turn leads to decreased performance and increased turnover intentions. The results also show that the effect of occupational identity is contingent on its level, with a more pronounced impact observed at lower levels under certain boundary conditions. Furthermore, the relationship between stigma and turnover intentions is weaker for those with stronger occupational identity. This study presents a novel theoretical framework from an Eastern perspective to enhance the understanding of occupational stigma. Its findings can contribute to the development of strategies for mitigating it.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianling Zhang & Gukseong Lee, 2025. "Does Occupational Identity Weaken the Effect of Stigma? Empirical Evidence of the Impact of Occupational Stigma on China’s Gig Economy," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367156
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251367156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251367156
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251367156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.