Author
Listed:
- Anh Ly
- Audrey-Ann Deneault
- Robbie Duschinsky
- Carlo Schuengel
- Sheri Madigan
Abstract
This study describes the historical trends and gaps of attachment research through a bibliometric analysis of past research on observational measures of child-parent attachment. Given the substantial amount of research that has been amassed on child-parent attachment since the publication of Bowlby and Ainsworth’s seminal work in the 1970s, this study provides an important synthesis of the state of child attachment research. This analysis leverages the Child Attachment Studies Catalog and Data Exchange (CASCADE) catalog, a repository of all empirical studies using observational measures of child-parent attachment. The bibliometric analysis includes a total of 2,318 peer-reviewed articles, book chapters, and dissertations from 1970 to 2023. Key study characteristics described include parent gender, geographical location, publication growth over time, publication venue, population samples, measurement tools, primary predictors, and main outcomes. Key findings reveal that the vast majority of child-parent attachment research over the past 50 years has been conducted on child-mother dyads (88.3%), has been set in North America (72.8%) or Europe (18.9%), is drawn predominantly from community samples (61.5%), and includes 24.4% of individuals of ethnic minority status. A small number of studies are conducted on samples with a demographic or health risk (24.7%), clinical risk (8.3%), or from foster/adoptive backgrounds (4.4%). Findings from this bibliometric analysis highlight the need for more attention to non-maternal caregivers, increased research on child attachment in non-Western settings, and more studies on at-risk populations including those from low socioeconomic backgrounds.
Suggested Citation
Anh Ly & Audrey-Ann Deneault & Robbie Duschinsky & Carlo Schuengel & Sheri Madigan, 2025.
"A Bibliometric Analysis of Publication Trends of Empirical Studies Over the Past 50 years Using the Child Attachment Studies Catalog and Data Exchange (CASCADE),"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367078
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251367078
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251367078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.