IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251364614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence in Connection: Teacher Collaboration as the Strongest Predictor of Inclusive Practices in Chinese Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Midya Yousefi
  • Qiusu Wang
  • Jahirul Mullick

Abstract

This study explores the critical role of teacher efficacy in implementing inclusive education (IE) within China, focusing on three key dimensions: providing inclusive instruction, collaborating with colleagues, and managing student behavior. Despite China’s policy-level advancements in IE, challenges persist, particularly in teacher preparedness, confidence, and resource availability. This study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional design, analyzing survey data from 211 primary and secondary school teachers across four Chinese cities (Beijing, Tianjin, Chengdu, and Qingdao). Regression analysis examined how teacher self-efficacy in three core domains—collaboration, inclusive instruction, and behavior management—predicted implementation of inclusive practices. The findings reveal that teacher efficacy in collaboration with colleagues is the strongest predictor of inclusive practices, highlighting the importance of professional cooperation in IE. However, gaps in teacher confidence, particularly in behavior management and instructional adaptation, pose significant barriers to effective inclusion. These insights emphasize the need for targeted professional development programs and policy interventions to enhance teacher readiness for IE. By offering an empirical perspective from a non-Western educational setting, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on IE. The findings hold practical implications for policymakers, teacher training programs, and school leadership, providing strategies to foster a more inclusive educational environment in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Midya Yousefi & Qiusu Wang & Jahirul Mullick, 2025. "Confidence in Connection: Teacher Collaboration as the Strongest Predictor of Inclusive Practices in Chinese Schools," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251364614
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251364614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251364614
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251364614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251364614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.