Author
Listed:
- Trinh Quoc Lap
- Phan Ngoc Tuong Vy
- Nguyen Thi My Hanh
- Le Cong Tuan
- Nguyen Thanh Hung
Abstract
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), widely established as a mainstream approach in ESL countries, is gaining traction in EFL contexts through selective programs and initiatives. Reflecting this trend, Vietnam’s educational reforms under the 2018 General Education Program have incorporated CLIL-informed lessons into newly adopted English textbooks, signaling a step toward integrating language and subject learning. However, the CLIL-informed lesson remains relatively new to EFL teachers in Vietnamese high schools. Surveying EFL teachers’ understandings and their teaching practices are crucial to discover their theoretical knowledge and practical application in teaching CLIL. It is essential to examine how other factors influence this relationship and identify the challenges and support teachers need in delivering these new lessons. The study employed a mixed-methods approach aimed at investigating EFL high school teachers’ understandings, teaching practices, challenges and needs when delivering CLIL-informed lessons. The study collected quantitative data from 326 participants, along with qualitative data from interviews from 6 chosen teachers. Findings revealed that with differing cognitive factors, educational backgrounds, and working circumstances, teachers demonstrated their adaptability by tailoring the lessons with their own “localized CLIL model†and expressed further support in training for maximizing CLIL benefits in harmony with other contextual constraints. These findings, under the lens of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, serve as valuable references for other EFL teachers, curriculum developers and textbook publishers in supporting the implementation and diffusion of CLIL.
Suggested Citation
Trinh Quoc Lap & Phan Ngoc Tuong Vy & Nguyen Thi My Hanh & Le Cong Tuan & Nguyen Thanh Hung, 2025.
"Toward the Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Shift: What are EFL Teachers’ Understandings, Practices, and Needs?,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251363336
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251363336
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251363336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.