IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251362269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Lexical Differences Between Academic and General Training IELTS Reading Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Linh Thi Thao Le
  • Nam Thi Phuong Ho
  • Nguyen Huynh Trang
  • Hung Tan Ha

Abstract

The International English Language Testing System (IELTS) has served as one of the most reliable proofs of people’s English language proficiency. There have been rumors about the discrepancy in difficulty between the two modules of IELTS, namely Academic (AC) and General Training (GT); however, there is little empirical evidence to confirm such a myth. This research directly compares the lexical demands, diversity, and sophistication between the reading passages in three sections of the two IELTS Reading test modules. 345 IELTS reading passages from 115 IELTS Reading tests were analyzed in terms of length, lexical diversity, sophistication, and demands. Results from the pairwise comparisons show significant differences between the three reading passages of the AC module and the first two reading sections of the GT module in terms of length and lexical sophistication. However, research findings also demonstrate insignificant differences between the AC passages and the last GT passage. In addition, results from lexical demand analyses confirm these findings by indicating that, for the AC reading passages and the last GT passage, learners need to be familiar with the most frequent 4,000 and 9,000 word families in the BNC/COCA lists to achieve 95% and 98% coverage, respectively. On the other hand, the first and second sections in the GT module only require a vocabulary knowledge at 3,000 to 6,000 levels for 95% and 98% coverage, correspondingly. Ultimately, implications for IELTS teaching and learning will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Linh Thi Thao Le & Nam Thi Phuong Ho & Nguyen Huynh Trang & Hung Tan Ha, 2025. "Revisiting the Lexical Differences Between Academic and General Training IELTS Reading Tests," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251362269
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251362269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251362269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251362269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251362269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.