IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251358068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Difference in Future Thinking Between Nurses with and without Burnout: A Case-Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yaping Feng
  • Bowen Xue
  • Zhiguo Hu
  • Shengya Feng
  • Yihui Zhao
  • Xin Li
  • Xiaoshan Yang
  • Hong Luo

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess differences in the expectation of positive and negative future events between nurses with and without burnout, as well as differences among nurses with different levels of burnout. A case-control study design were adopted for this research. Participants were recruited from a tertiary hospital in the eastern region of China. Data collection took place between November 2021 and March 2022. Based on the Chinese version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, participants were categorized into four groups: mild burnout, moderate burnout, severe burnout, and no burnout. Between-group comparisons included nurses with and without burnout, while within-group comparisons included nurses with different levels of burnout. The Oral Word Association Test (OWAT) and Future Thinking Task (FTT) were used to obtain 40 items related to nurses’ future thinking. Participants used a computer to assess the likelihood, importance, and emotional responses to each scenario. Nurses’ perceptions of the likelihood of positive future events are negatively correlated with emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and positively correlated with low personal accomplishment. Compared to nurses without burnout, those with burnout have more pessimistic expectations and believe that negative future events are more likely to occur. Nurses with burnout perceive positive future events as less important, and as the severity of burnout increases, they view negative future events as more significant. The present study demonstrated that nurses with burnout are more likely to have negative expectations of the future and to improperly highlight the importance of future negative events.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaping Feng & Bowen Xue & Zhiguo Hu & Shengya Feng & Yihui Zhao & Xin Li & Xiaoshan Yang & Hong Luo, 2025. "The Difference in Future Thinking Between Nurses with and without Burnout: A Case-Control Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251358068
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251358068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251358068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251358068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251358068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.