IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251358041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Indigenous Hunting Body Cultural Research as an Emerging Collaborative Self-Governing Approach for Green Ethical Cultural Advocacy as “Protected Belief Statusâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Ta Fang
  • Toby Precious T. Nwachukwu
  • Nikky Lin
  • Chien-Shing Lee

Abstract

The gaps in the literature and the nonexistence of restrictions from present-day legislation are the bane of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in hunting cultural practice. This research explores and engages qualitative research by applying visual and dictated information on hunting body culture transformation for indigenous ecological knowledge. Ethical and greening advocacy an emerging collaborative framework for hunting activities through the eyes and experience of the aboriginal people of Taiwan was used to explore the relationships between TEK and self-governing management to grasp and experience the meaning of Hunting Body Culture (HBC). Twelve activities of Taiwan’s Gaga aboriginal hunting behaviors from longitudinal research from 2012 to 2024 were observed by reading hunting photo-voice information and interviewing fourteen aboriginal hunters. The findings include the utilization of Green Ethical Cultural Advocacy (GECA) to reflect the study’s outcomes on social norms, hunting harvest patterns, hunting ritual events, forming of hunting groups, the choice of hunting tools, game selection differences, personalized attributes like solitude; and generic tolerance for indigenous cultural heritage as a Protected belief transforming toward a legislative Protected Status . Future research should triangulate positivist/interpretive and mixed approaches to navigate the ethical justice pattern for TEK and the use of digital technology to administer greening ethical cultural advocacy in hunting. The implications of the research to theory and practice were specified, as we proposed four distinctive principles for green hunting.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Ta Fang & Toby Precious T. Nwachukwu & Nikky Lin & Chien-Shing Lee, 2025. "Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Indigenous Hunting Body Cultural Research as an Emerging Collaborative Self-Governing Approach for Green Ethical Cultural Advocacy as “Protected Belief Statusâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251358041
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251358041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251358041
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251358041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251358041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.