Author
Listed:
- Zhou Qiaoqiao
- Noritah Omar
- Zainor Izat Zainal
- Ida Baizura Bahar
Abstract
This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to address the limitations of systematic literature reviews in handling large datasets, and provides a comprehensive knowledge map and future avenues of cognitive literary studies (CLS) that have yet to be systematically explored. Utilizing VOSviewer as a quantitative tool supplemented by qualitative interpretation, this study analyzes 1,283 journal articles extracted from Web of Science Core Collection database, aiming to offer a longitudinal view of CLS’s evolving landscape. This study identifies its inception, journal and national contributions, influential scholars, and articles using citation analysis. It examines dominant research themes and predicts developing trends using co-citation and co-word analysis. This study yields the following findings: (1) CLS research began in 1975, with a notable surge from 2000 onward; (2) Poetics Today is the most influential journal, with the United States leading in academic contributions. Scholars such as Zunshine, Palmer, Fauconnier & Turner and their works are most frequently co-cited; (3) The four dominant research topics are cognitive/theoretical/ontological foundations of narrative, intersection between cognitive poetics and cognitive linguistics, affective cognition in literary studies, and extended cognition and the environment; (4) The five developing trends are the neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading, expansion of scope in CLS, second-generation approaches to CLS, neuroesthetics and literary perception, and cognitive function of imagination. This study offers a foundational profile that contributes to the consolidation of CLS as a multidisciplinary and evolving field, facilitating a more systematic understanding of the theoretical engagement and methodological innovation within the field.
Suggested Citation
Zhou Qiaoqiao & Noritah Omar & Zainor Izat Zainal & Ida Baizura Bahar, 2025.
"Knowledge Map and Future Avenue of Cognitive Literary Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis (1975–2024),"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251357186
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251357186
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251357186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.