Author
Listed:
- Sakiba Binte Yusuf
- Qian Jiancheng
- Ushba Rasool
- Raju Dhuli
- Quazi Farzana Yesmin
- Rashed Mahmud
- Alamgir Hossain
Abstract
The study investigates EFL learners’ perceptions of using Grammarly to enhance their writing proficiency in Bangladesh. English writing skills are vital for EFL learners, particularly in a globalized context where proficiency in English plays a significant role among non-native speakers. The study aims to explore and analyze learners’ perspectives on the benefits of Grammarly for improving writing skills. This study employs a mixed-method approach, utilizing a questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews, with participants from Daffodil International University in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The quantitative survey data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS software, while directed qualitative content analysis was applied to the interview data. The findings reveal that Grammarly is perceived positively by learners, who report improvements in various aspects of their writing, including grammar, coherence, and vocabulary usage. However, the study is not without limitations. The sample size is relatively small and limited to one university, which may not represent the broader EFL learner population in Bangladesh. Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable insights into the potential of technological tools in language education, emphasizing the need for further studies with larger and more diverse samples to validate and extend these findings. Future implications include the recommendation for educators to incorporate Grammarly and similar tools into their teaching practices to enhance EFL learners’ writing skills.
Suggested Citation
Sakiba Binte Yusuf & Qian Jiancheng & Ushba Rasool & Raju Dhuli & Quazi Farzana Yesmin & Rashed Mahmud & Alamgir Hossain, 2025.
"Investigating EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Using Grammarly in Enhancing Writing Proficiency in Bangladesh,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251352922
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251352922
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251352922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.