Author
Abstract
The organizational relationships that makerspaces cultivate with their business partners and government agencies exert a significant influence on their resource allocation strategies and subsequent performance outcomes. This study examines the impact of both business ties and political ties, conceptualized as facets of organizational relationships, on makerspaces’ competitive performance, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of resource bricolage and resource slack. Furthermore, environmental turbulence is recognized as a crucial boundary condition influencing the relationship between these ties and performance outcomes. Utilizing an empirical research design, data was collected through 216 valid questionnaires from makerspaces spanning diverse regions and industries. Systematic data analysis was conducted using AMOS 21.0 and SPSS 20.0. The findings indicate a positive correlation between both business ties and political ties, and competitive performance. Notably, both resource bricolage and resource slack mediate these relationships. However, environmental turbulence amplifies only the relationship between political ties and competitive performance. This research underscores the significance of organizational ties in enhancing the effectiveness of makerspaces’ incubation role in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship. By integrating external organizational relationships with the management and utilization of resources, this study offers valuable insights for the construction and optimization of makerspaces. It emphasizes that strengthening business and political ties with relevant entrepreneurial entities can effectively improve resource allocation efficiency, provide superior incubation services for innovation and entrepreneurship, and ultimately attain a heightened competitive advantage.
Suggested Citation
Tianfei Yang & Xianyi Long, 2025.
"Relationship, Resource and Performance of Makerspace in China: From the Perspective of Business Ties and Political Ties,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251351803
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251351803
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251351803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.