IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251343954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence or Human: The Use of ChatGPT in the Academic Translation for Religious Texts

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Q. Shormani
  • Abdulrahaman Alfahad

Abstract

This article presents an empirical study investigating the ability of ChatGPT to translate religious texts involved in academic writing. Specifically, religious texts are not easy to translate even for human proficient translators. Three Arabic academic abstracts, religion-oriented, were involved in our study taken from AlQalam Journal which is published in Arabic and English. They have ready translations by the language adviser of the journal. The Arabic abstracts were first translated into English by ChatGPT. We then analyzed and compared ChatGPT translation to the human translation in terms of semantics and syntax. The former is represented by academic inappropriateness, failing to capture religious nuances, redundancy, translation gaps, and englishization, while the latter by first-person pronouns, to-infinitival vs. gerund use, passive versus active voice, full relative clauses, and indefiniteness. The findings revealed that ChatGPT’s performance is still far from human translation, and that ChatGPT translation needs significant human postediting. The study concludes with substantial recommendations for researchers and ChatGPT developers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Q. Shormani & Abdulrahaman Alfahad, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence or Human: The Use of ChatGPT in the Academic Translation for Religious Texts," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251343954
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251343954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251343954
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251343954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251343954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.