IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251343368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on the English Graduation Benchmark (EGB) Policy: Insights From Taiwanese Medical University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Hsiu Huang
  • Kuei-Ju Tsai

Abstract

In the face of growing globalization and international market integration, there is a rising demand for the English Graduation Benchmark (EGB) policy in Taiwanese higher education. While previous research has addressed students’ views on the EGB policy and its positive and negative effects on learning and teaching, medical university students’ perspectives still need to be explored. This study surveyed 755 students from 7 medical disciplines at a Taiwanese university, examining their experiences and attitudes toward the EGB policy. Four aspects were examined: students’ general opinion on the policy (GO), learning efforts put (LE), washback effect (WE), and support needed (SN). Findings indicate a broad consensus among students on the policy’s potential benefits, particularly in enhancing employability and prospects for further studies. Students primarily relied on vocabulary memorization and grammar study to boost their English skills. Delving into their emotional responses, the washback effect of the policy appeared minimal. Notably, the academic discipline emerged as a significant determinant of students’ views: College of Pharmacy students showed the highest support for the policy and the most pronounced washback effect. In contrast, the College of Medical Sociology and Psychology students expressed the highest demand for institutional support.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Hsiu Huang & Kuei-Ju Tsai, 2025. "Perspectives on the English Graduation Benchmark (EGB) Policy: Insights From Taiwanese Medical University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251343368
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251343368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251343368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251343368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251343368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.