IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251348802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IT Professionals Versus the Public: Who’s More Optimistic About AI’s Future Impacts?

Author

Listed:
  • Ngo Thaiduong

Abstract

Understanding the contrasting perspectives of Information Technology Professionals (ITPs) and the general public on artificial intelligence (AI) is crucial for responsible AI development and deployment, as these viewpoints can significantly influence its adoption and societal impact. This study investigates how ITPs’ deeper knowledge of Generative AI translates into differing viewpoints on its future impact, particularly on the job market. A quantitative content analysis of over 2,700 online newspaper comments in Vietnam reveals a more polarized perspective among ITPs. While both groups share job displacement concerns, ITPs express a wider range of beliefs, acknowledging both potential benefits and limitations of AI’s influence on the job market. Furthermore, ITP views remain relatively stable over time compared to the public’s increasing negativity toward AI. The analysis also highlights ITPs’ stronger focus on AI-driven efficiency gains alongside a more nuanced awareness of AI’s inherent shortcomings. This study contributes to the understanding of AI perception by highlighting the influence of technical expertise on shaping public opinion and offering insights for tailoring AI communication strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngo Thaiduong, 2025. "IT Professionals Versus the Public: Who’s More Optimistic About AI’s Future Impacts?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251348802
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251348802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251348802
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251348802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251348802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.