IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251348288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Rhetorical Relations in Multimodal Discourse Analysis of LMOOCs for English Learning on a Chinese MOOC Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Zheng
  • Yuanlan Jiang
  • Jian-E- Peng

Abstract

English Language MOOCs (LMOOCs) employ multimodal resources to enhance second language learners’ engagement and motivation. This study examined the multimodal instructional discourse in English LMOOCs in a Chinese MOOC platform, focusing on the rhetorical relations between the linguistic mode, termed verbiage, and two non-linguistic modes, namely facial expressions and gestures. Employing Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) as its theoretical framework, this study involved a multimodal discourse analysis of 12 English LMOOCs. Specifically, it analyzed and compared the distribution of facial expressions and gestures, and rhetorical relations between verbiage and facial expressions and between verbiage and gestures in six nationally accredited quality LMOOCs and six regular LMOOCs without such national accreditation. The results revealed a significant association between course type and the use of the two non-linguistic modes. In addition, Elaboration, Emphasis , and Preparation were the three relations identified in two types of modal synergy: Verbiage + Facial expressions (i.e., V + FEs) and Verbiage + Gestures (i.e., V + Gestures), the latter also containing Restatement relation. A significant association between course type and the distribution of rhetorical relations was only identified in the V + Gestures but not in the V + FEs. This study contributes important insights into how linguistic and non-linguistic modes work together for meaning-making in LMOOCs and provides evidence for the applicability of RST in analyzing multimodal online teaching. Implications for practitioners are finally addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Zheng & Yuanlan Jiang & Jian-E- Peng, 2025. "Exploring Rhetorical Relations in Multimodal Discourse Analysis of LMOOCs for English Learning on a Chinese MOOC Platform," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251348288
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251348288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251348288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251348288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251348288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.