IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251345713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility and Strategic Value of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Under Different Market Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Chen
  • Sean Te-Hsun Lin
  • Narisu Liu

Abstract

The literature has always examined the feasibility of PWYW pricing under a single market structure and has paid less attention to the strategic value of PWYW pricing. These studies have focused on consumers’ payment decisions while ignoring sellers’ pricing decisions. To fill these gaps, we design a laboratory experiment based on a sample of 192 Chinese undergraduate students to comprehensively and systematically examine the feasibility and strategic value of PWYW pricing under three different market structures. The results show that PWYW pricing is more feasible for sellers in monopolistic markets than in competitive markets because buyers in monopolistic markets hold stronger intention-based and outcome-based social preferences; PWYW pricing can help sellers achieve a higher level of profitability when additional gains are available and the average production cost or marginal cost is low; whether PWYW sellers can cover the entire market depends on the market structure; and the PWYW seller can significantly reduce the average profit of the fixed-pricing seller, which may force the latter out of the market in the long run. These findings will advance our understanding of the feasibility and strategic value of PWYW pricing. In addition, this paper also contributes to the PWYW literature by creatively designing an experiment with three market structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Chen & Sean Te-Hsun Lin & Narisu Liu, 2025. "Feasibility and Strategic Value of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Under Different Market Structures," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251345713
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251345713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251345713
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251345713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251345713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.