IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251342349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Telework on Job Satisfaction and Work–Family Conflict: Insights From Japan and Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jaeyoul Shin

Abstract

While many studies have shown that telework can improve job satisfaction and reduce work–family conflict, most have been conducted in the U.S. or Europe. Few studies have focused on South Korea and Japan, where organizational dedication is highly valued and gender discrimination is more severe than it is in European countries. Previous research indicates that introducing telework in organizational cultures that demand high commitment to the organization can increase domestic and caregiving workloads for female teleworkers, exacerbating work–family conflict. This study aimed to examine the impact of telework on job satisfaction and work–family conflict in Korea and Japan using survey data collected in September 2022 from married men and women aged 30 to 44. The findings reveal that telework improved job satisfaction and reduced working hours, indicating that teleworking employees in these countries are generally more satisfied with their jobs. However, telework amplified work–family conflict among teleworkers. The study found no significant moderating effect of gender on the relationship between telework and job satisfaction or work–family conflict, indicating that the effects of telework are consistent across genders in these countries. This study highlights the need for policymakers and organizations to implement supportive policies to alleviate the increased work–family conflict caused by introducing telework.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaeyoul Shin, 2025. "Impact of Telework on Job Satisfaction and Work–Family Conflict: Insights From Japan and Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251342349
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251342349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251342349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251342349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251342349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.