IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251340475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Chinese Pharmacy Postgraduates Regarding Academic Research and Academic Misconduct: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Meili Cheng
  • Shuai Zhang
  • Chunhua Zhao
  • Xiuxiu Shen
  • Di Wu

Abstract

Pharmacy postgraduates are an indispensable force for conducting research in pharmaceutical science and technology. However, how they conduct academic research and perceive academic misconduct has remained underexplored. This study aims to investigate the perceptions of Chinese pharmacy postgraduates on academic research and academic misconduct. This study utilized the method of inductive content analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 Chinese pharmacy postgraduates at a medical university in China, including seven males and 10 females. The subsequent data analysis categorized the interview content into primary themes and subthemes, adhering to rigorous and established research protocols. The study identified and reported five key themes concerning the perceptions of academic research and misconduct among Chinese pharmacy postgraduates at a medical university in China: motivations for engaging in academic research, challenges encountered in academic research, strategies for overcoming research challenges, underlying causes of academic misconduct, and impacts of academic misconduct. Chinese pharmacy postgraduates in this study exhibited a spectrum of individual motivations that drove their engagement in academic pursuits, while simultaneously confronting a multitude of internal and external barriers throughout their research endeavors. They surmounted these impediments through a combination of self-adjustment, independent problem-solving, and seeking external assistance. They unanimously believed that academic misconduct was both unethical and illegal, further identifying its root causes and highlighting its broader threat to the academic community. Drawing on these findings, the following recommendations are proposed for academic educators to foster Chinese pharmacy postgraduates’ development: invigorating their research interests, bolstering their research competencies, offering training in critical areas, enhancing the research and writing proficiencies, and developing holistic evaluation criteria for scholarships and honors.

Suggested Citation

  • Meili Cheng & Shuai Zhang & Chunhua Zhao & Xiuxiu Shen & Di Wu, 2025. "Perceptions of Chinese Pharmacy Postgraduates Regarding Academic Research and Academic Misconduct: A Qualitative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251340475
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251340475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251340475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251340475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251340475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.