IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251340343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Public Opinion and Its Indirect Influence on Americans’ Policy Support During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Hang Lu

Abstract

This study investigates how poll-based emotion consensus messaging influences American support for various policies during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, with an aim to unpack the cognitive-emotional mechanisms behind this influence. Employing a between-subjects factorial experiment with a national sample of U.S. adults ( N  = 1,087), the research method involved randomly assigning participants to one of five consensus message conditions: seriousness, anger, sadness, anxiety, or control. The results demonstrated that emotion consensus messaging indirectly influenced policy support through a sequential process: first, by shaping perceived emotion consensus, and then by altering individual emotional responses. Specifically, anger consensus messaging increased support for punitive policies, sadness for humanitarian aid, and anxiety for risk-averse options like concessions. In line with the heuristic-systematic model, this study revealed that the influence of consensus messaging was moderated by perceived issue importance, with significant effects observed primarily among participants who considered the issue to be of low importance. This study concludes that poll-based emotion consensus messaging can indirectly shape public policy support, particularly when the issue at hand is not deemed critical by the audience.

Suggested Citation

  • Hang Lu, 2025. "Emotional Public Opinion and Its Indirect Influence on Americans’ Policy Support During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251340343
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251340343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251340343
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251340343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251340343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.