IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251339659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Second Language Learners’ Perceptions of Conversations in English Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Hui
  • Thora Tenbrink

Abstract

This study addresses how Chinese learners of English as a second language (L2) perceive conversations in English materials as compared to speakers of English as a first language (L1). Data were collected through questionnaires completed by 48 participants (28 L2 English learners in China and 20 L1 English speakers in the UK), eliciting evaluations of written versions of two conversations from the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) and the College English Test (CET) Band 6 of China. Overall, learners favored the CET conversation, but L1 speakers preferred the IELTS one. A content analysis uncovered five major attention foci among participants: Language, Discourse, Content, Context, and Learning, with L1 speakers focusing more on the genuineness of language at a macro level than learners, who mostly attended to words and sentence structure. More detailed discourse analysis of lexical items reflecting appraisal highlighted that learners showed high awareness of context-related authenticity and evaluated difficulty with respect to a wide range of aspects, whereas L1 speakers evaluated the authenticity at language and discourse levels and commented on the perceived difficulty of content and learning. Implications for teaching and learning spoken English with materials include the importance of offering explicit information about authenticity and spoken features of conversations that students may otherwise fail to notice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Hui & Thora Tenbrink, 2025. "Second Language Learners’ Perceptions of Conversations in English Materials," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251339659
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251339659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251339659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251339659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251339659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.